Publications

Accepted papers

  • SuperSycophantic: Stress-Testing Frontier LLMs from Single- to Multi-Turn Sycophancy

    T. Zhang, O. Yasunaga, W. Jiang, J. Bo, F. Draye, A. Javadov, Arth Singh, L. Muir, V. Oldemburgo de Mello, B. Schölkopf, Z. Jin

    NeurIPS 2026

    Stress-tested 9 frontier models on objective and subjective sycophancy under first-turn framing and multi-turn pressure. Even GPT-5.4 flips correct answers to please users in 23.8% of objective cases, with user-tone strength a dominant, previously overlooked driver.

  • Predicting the Critic: Training on User Feedback Reshapes Emergent Misalignment

    X. J. Zhou, Arth Singh, U. S. T. Carr, E. Tennant

    AI4Good @ NeurIPS 2026 Oral 🎉 and DevAI @ NeurIPS 2026

    Appends a one-line user reaction to 7,049 bad-medical-advice fine-tuning episodes and varies only whether the reaction tokens count toward the loss. Trained on, criticism teaches the model to predict its critic and can raise emergent misalignment (reliably on Qwen2.5); placed before the question as a note, it lowers misalignment in all five model families by ten points on average, but restoring the note-format context at evaluation brings it back.

  • Fluid Reasoning Representations

    D. Kharlapenko, T. Zhang, Arth Singh, A. Stolfo, A. Conmy, M. Sachan, Z. Jin

    Findings of EMNLP 2026 arXiv

    Introduces FRRs, a representation-level account of how extended-thinking LLMs organize action and predicate concepts. On obfuscated planning, symbolic, and math tasks, cross-naming steering and causal patching show reasoning sharpens a dynamic already latent in base models.

  • Mechanistically Interpreting Compression in Vision-Language Models

    V. Elluru, Arth Singh, R. Aguero, A. Agarwal, D. Das, H. Paul

    Mechanistic Interpretability Workshop @ ICML 2026 arXiv

    Circuit and crosscoder analysis of how pruning and quantization change VLM internals, plus VLMSafe-420, a harmful-vs-benign-counterfactual benchmark showing pruning sharply erodes genuine refusal.

Preprints

  • Mechanistic Analysis of Alignment Algorithms in Language Models

    A. Sinha, I. Garg, V. Elluru, Arth Singh, K. Garg

    arXiv preprint, May 2026 arXiv

    A mechanistic comparison of six preference-optimization methods (PPO, DPO, SimPO, ORPO, GRPO, and KTO) across three open-weight model families using linear probes, sparse autoencoders, and crosscoders. KTO and GRPO sharpen the linear separability of preference signals, DPO and ORPO degrade it through geometric rotation and feature attenuation, and PPO and SimPO largely preserve the base model's geometry.

  • Toward Human-AI Complementarity Across Diverse Tasks

    Y. Xu, A. Dahmani, M. D. Blanchard, N. Dern, E. Nastase, F. Bianco, M. Pavlovic, S. Krishna, E. Modesitt, M. A. Christ, Arth Singh, G. Molinaro, S. B. Sengupta, J. Pamarthi, A. Menon, R. Jain

    arXiv preprint, March 2026 arXiv

    Investigated human-AI complementarity through hybridization and two AI assistance methods on a 1,886-sample multi-domain dataset. Led the analyses for quantitative overreliance, GPQA positional bias, and oracle hybridization bounds.